Wikipedia:Peer review/15.ai/archive1

15.ai

I've listed this article for peer review because it has a potential to be a decent article, but it has had a difficult history. Namely, it was affected by socking earlier on, causing it to improperly become a GA; then it underwent a GAR and was even deleted. In the recent discussions, primarily the last AfD, there was much discussion around the strength of sourcing. I am interested in an outside reviewer's position primarily on whether certain statements supported by some of the weaker sources should be removed. The second issue is the appropriateness of the 'Background' section, seeing how most of the statements there come from sources that are not about the subject.

Thanks, —Alalch E. 23:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)