Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion/NVO

Articles created by NVO - moved here from project.

Article created, let's see

Which article? Let's be honest I did no really pretend to compose utter newbie prose (some self-respect should remain, should it not?) but I deliberately erred with categories, omitted endashes (or emdashes?) and did not wikilink from other articles (there are plenty) and did not put the punchline into the lead (rather, it's spread over the very brief body of text: db-a7 test). Subject is all over the books but, bad for him, never earned an MTV award and never will. Will 24 hours suffice for a test? NVO (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. If it survives 24 hours then I suspect it will last all week, but the challenge is at least 7 days because a journalist has set that time span. However I'd suggest running it for longer, at least until it is tagged as patrolled or falls of the end of the unpatrolled queue. I'm quite tempted to keep the test going until someone else edits the article or the author's account. Ϣere SpielChequers 18:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

40 hours passed, no patrols, no greetings... anyone? The sock created another article, this time properly formatted, that was instantly patrolled (I felt obliged to explain the situation to the patroller and so blew the cover). NVO (talk) 07:32, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All I can say that the original Julien David Le Roy (now a redirect) is still unpatrolled since 14:43 Oct. 8. Yes, all three articles survived but there was hardly a reason to tag any of them (wishful thinking?). NVO (talk) 05:39, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Lens III and William Craft Brumfield were also very nice pieces of work and have both been patrolled. I would have been shocked if any newpage patroller had tagged them for deletion, but I'm disappointed in our welcoming committee that such a fine new editor wasn't welcomed into the community. Ϣere SpielChequers 06:25, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]