Teaching with Wikipedia @ NYU, April 17, 2018

Teaching with Wikipedia @ NYU
Date	April 17, 2018
Time	4:30-6:30 pm ET
Address	411 Lafayette Street, 4th Floor
City, State	New York, NY

Overview

Wikipedia, now in its 17th year, remains an online space where accuracy, neutrality, and fair representation matters. Empowering a diverse group of editors (including students!) to contribute to Wikipedia (the largest collaborative writing project in history!) is one way to ensure that high quality information is freely available to all.

This afternoon workshop will will train participants to become Wikipedia editors, and along the way they will cultivate a greater understanding of how to create classroom assignments that will engage and empower students while reinforcing core writing and communication skills.

Please bring your laptop!

Here is our Slide Deck

Participant list

Please add your Wikipedia username below

Click "edit source." Add the # sign (to continue numbering.)

Then, create your signature by typing four tildes [~] in a row and hitting "Save changes."

Amyc29 Amyc29 (talk) 21:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nymaker (talk) 17:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lsrkthelibrarian (talk) 22:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Rtbhive (talk) 13:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FAQ

How reliable is Wikipedia?

Check out Accuracy of content

Who edits Wikipedia?

Check out Wikipedia#Community

Also worth knowing about

Thinking like a Wikipedian

Basic guidelines, communication customs, editing customs

The focus here is on developing your "Wikipedia hat," so you can read and evaluate Wikipedia articles based on Wikipedia's standards, not those from your own areas of expertise. (n.b.: Modified from exercise created by User:AmandaRR123)

Read over the following Wikipedia policy/guideline pages, and then use what you've learned to evaluate one of the articles listed.

(Hint: Read "nutshells" and intros most carefully, then skim the rest of each policy/guideline page. That will give you the sense you need.)

Articles to evaluate: pick one, and use your new "Wikipedia hat" to evaluate them. How might they be improved?

Rating and Communicating on Wikipedia

What Class Labels mean (Featured Article, C-Class, Start-Class, etc.): Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
Wikipedia:The perfect article
Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines

Some options for making your first edit

Citation Hunt: A tool from Wikimedia Foundation Labs to help where [[citation needed]]

WikiGrabber: Another tool to help find where [[citation needed]]

Training to edit Wikipedia

Going forward: some resources to help you determine what and how to contribute

WikiProject
What Class Labels mean (Featured Article, C-Class, Start-Class, etc.): Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
Portals on wikipedia
Missing articles
Wikipedia:Stubs
Wikipedia:Most-wanted articles
Wikipedia:Translating
Wikipedia:Red links
Wikipedia:Women in Red

Good Digital Citizenship and Activism in Wikipedia: Underrepresented Groups and Topics

written by User:AmandaRR123, February 2016

Problem: Wikipedia is a globally distributed network where judgement of quality is not based around contributor expertise, but rather work according to the standards of the project itself -- the most legible unit of work is a good citation. As one of the oldest communities on the Internet, Wikipedia gives students to a chance to practice good digital citizenship: use their critical thinking skills to discover community values, norms and styles of communication, and contribute in a way that will make sense to other community members.

However, Wikipedia can, like many other communities, have a bias towards the status quo. Therefore, those working on issues related to underrepresented groups can expect to be accused of activism, bias, an agenda, as if those things do not already exist on Wikipedia

Digital citizenship is doubly important to those working on issues related to underrepresented groups: one must know how to communicate effectively using community standards to convince the Wikipedian community that changes in the status quo does not automatically equal violating policy, and that you are still partners in the same goal of wanting to improve the encyclopedia.

Resources we can draw from

Google News

Google Books

Google Scholar Note! You can synchronize Google Scholar with your institution's library. Check it out!

Better Googling: NYU Libraries Google search tips