Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 November 18

< November 17	November 19 >

November 18

Image:Snow in San Bernardino Streets.jpg

Image:Snow in San Bernardino Streets.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sb909 (notify | contribs).

LQ - Low quality, low-resolution image that is dark and a little poorly composed Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No one will miss this. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - probably a copyvio, judging by other uploads by that user, now blocked.. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 03:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dont Delet - a nice picture of snow in a big city of southern California itt dosent bug no won! by the way i do care.. User:Ie909 (talk)November 23, 2007 (UTC)
Dont Delet - I like this picture it shows the nice snow fall in San Bernardino you guys dont even have a picture of a San Bernardino Snowfall so why delet?? just leave it!.. User:Bpz (talk)November 24, 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.81.193.164 (talk)

NOTE: Ie909 and 66.81.193.164 are the same person. See SSP case on User:House1090. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While I heard it did snow in SB once a few years ago, which is unusual for that area, the street signs are illegible and there is nothing else in this photo to especially connect the event to SB. Amerique^dialectics 17:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dont Delet - Dont Delet this picture is a record snowfall so by tht reason it should be set to be viewed by reaserchers, this snow fall was in January 12, 2007... San Bernardino gets snow flurries about every 2-3 years there for this that year it was the 3rd year it snowed year after year after year there fore it should be saved! wiki user(not logged in!)November 25, 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.81.193.154 (talk)

The uploader claims that this image has been released under a free license by the copyright holder, but the given source does not say so at all - similar to three other of his images nominated for deletion yesterday. High on a tree (talk) 10:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aged_Canadian_whisky.jpg

Image:Aged_Canadian_whisky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ratesreal1 (notify | contribs).

Bizarre licensing; clearly a misunderstanding. Whatever the case, this doesn't look like a free image, and given the user's upload history, this is likely a copyright violation. -- RG ² 12:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the clearly bad image tags (wikipedia logo?!?) but I still think it's a "replaceable fair-use" at best. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 21:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. On the one hand, it's probably replaceable fair-use. However, this uploader has repeatedly refused to provide sources for other images he's uploaded (which, not being sent to IfD, I'm about to speedy delete under the provisions for non-free images without source information). Since we can't determine the source of the image, I don't see how we can use it. —C.Fred (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 02:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deleted - obvious copyvio. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 03:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wikipedia-Children12.png

Image:Wikipedia-Children12.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ashwinkn (notify | contribs).

No longer needed disclaimer image. Rocket000 (talk) 14:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Naked_yoga.jpg

Image:Naked_yoga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Fullah (notify | contribs).

Copyright violation - The image might be used in violation of copyright. Follow this link to notice the original at Simonscans. Pichote (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obvious copyvio, I'll support a speedy for this one... --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 22:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nemesis_logo3.gif

Image:Nemesis_logo3.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by House_Koloth (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Papastathopoulos-2007.jpg

Image:Papastathopoulos-2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by The-real-zeus (notify | contribs).

User:The-real-zeus uploaded Image:Papastathopoulos-2007.jpg yesterday. User:The-real-zeus has an (to quote User:Muchness) "extensive history of attempting to circumvent Wikipedia's image use policies (see upload log, block log)". User:Muchness nominated a bunch of these images at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2007_August_19 but since he claimed he was the copyright holder, even if his explanation was weak, good faith was assumed, and the images kept.

I asked User:The-real-zeus if he really had taken Image:Papastathopoulos-2007.jpg and this conversation took place:

==Image:Papastathopoulos-2007.jpg==

Did you take this image? Rette tast 20:47, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YesThe-real-zeus (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So You work for AEK? Rette tast 20:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umhum...The-real-zeus (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Rette tast 20:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly,i work for AEK,took the picture,uploaded them all to aekfc.gr The-real-zeus (talk) 21:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you wont mind sending an mail from your AEK mailaddress to the OTRS confirming the release or noting on the AEK website that the image is released under CC-BY-2.0 then? Rette tast 21:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an image with better resolution btw. Rette tast 21:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry mate i dont have a higher oneThe-real-zeus (talk) 21:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats ok, as long as you verify the copyright as by sending an e-mail, or noting the license on the AEK webpage. That wont be a problem, will it? Rette tast 21:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ofcourse not...The-real-zeus (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great, which method do you prefer. The mail or the website change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rettetast (talk • contribs)

You know what i dont like that image anymore,i will get a beter one tommorow,could you delete it for me...cheers..lol... :D The-real-zeus (talk) 21:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In light of The-real-zeus dubious explanation and his earlier uploads, the image is probably a blatant copyvio. His claims are dubious an I am nominating all of the images where The-real-zeus has claimed copyright. We can not trust this user when it comes to copyright and his earliers upload should also be deleted. Rette tast 21:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; based on this latest exchange and the uploader's track record of image policy violations, I feel his claims to own the copyrights to these images are dubious at best. --Muchness (talk) 23:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M&ts.jpg

Image:M&ts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Shindig64 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nilf anion (talk) 20:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Landscape_3-31.JPG

Image:Landscape_3-31.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cooper60 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned. Either this is a low-quality bit of photoshopping and not useful for us, or a photograph of a picture and so a copyvio. Nilf anion (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a scan of a painting done by Greg Edmonson and probably came from his website. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 04:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bryant Pit Bull.JPG

Image:Bryant Pit Bull.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hightider87 (notify | contribs).

LQ (blurry camera-phone pic) OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 04:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]