Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2023 April 13
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 12 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 14 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
April 13
[edit]I have never seen such a strange layout, with the image on the side squashed against the text. What can I do to solve it? Aldyr Schlee. JackkBrown (talk) 00:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is that the image is of unusual proportions, so it's going to strike us as a little odd. I would rather spend time cleaning up the bibliography, which in its current form does not distinguish between articles, books and... I don't know whats. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @JackkBrown: Hi again! I cropped the photo and formatted it so the caption is visible. You can add an infobox to help with the layout. The best place to discuss improvements to the article is its talk page: Talk:Aldyr Schlee. GoingBatty (talk) 01:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- FWIW, I wouldn't be too sure about that file being OK for Commons since the claim of "own work" seems sketchy at best. It's fairly poor quality and looks like it was cropped (and then possibly enlarged) from another image. There's also no EXIF data or other information to aid in verifying the claim of own work. Finally, all of the image-related notifications on the uploader's Commons user talk page might be seen as a indication that the uploader is prone to mistakes when it comes to file licensing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Semut
[edit]I have edits that I would like to have made to the Semut entry but I do not know how to make them. I have written them into a word document using track changes and I wonder if it is possible for someone to put these into the system. at my age I find it very difficult using your system. I have copied the word document Here:
Proposed edit
|
---|
Operation Semut was a series of reconnaissance operations carried out by Australia's Z Special Unit in 1945, during the final stages of World War II. This operation was the part of the Borneo Campaign, and was undertaken in Sarawak, British North Borneo (Sabah), Brunei and Kalimantan in northern Borneo,[1] in support of Allied operations to secure North Borneo. Another closely related operation codenamed Agas was carried out concurrently in North Borneo (present day Sabah). Both operations combined and relayed their intelligence through the Stallion Project to Australian forces and carried out guerrilla warfare against the Japanese in the region with the full support of the local population. A total of four operations were undertaken under the auspices of Operation Semut, concluding in September and October 1945. Background[edit] Early in the Pacific War, the Japanese had landed in north-west Borneo and had quickly captured the area's vital oilfields, which had begun contributing to their war effort by 1943. Allied efforts to interdict the flow of oil had been limited largely to aerial bombing in the intervening period as Allied ground efforts had focussed upon the drive on the Philippines. Planning for covert operations in Borneo by Allied forces, had begun shortly after the Japanese had captured north-west Borneo in December 1941. A British intelligence officer, Second Lieutenant P. M. Synge, based in Oxford, suggested that "a force of 500 men or more if necessary, skilled in forest-craft, could be raised..." from among the local population "...and organised into an effective guerilla force". Synge then submitted a proposal of the operations, but by February 1942 the operation had been rejected because it was not feasible at that time. In July 1942, Tom Harrisson, who had been an Oxford Sarawak Expedition leader in 1932, drew another similar proposal that put an emphasis on operations against Seria oilfields in Brunei rather than Miri oilfields in Sarawak. Meanwhile, Captain D. L. Leach proposed to use former Borneo civil servants to identify and contact locals and Chinese who were still loyal to the Allied forces, to organise them and to establish three main bases along the Baram River, in the Rejang basin, and upriver on the Rejang in preparation to support large scale Allied operations in the area. While these plans were not acted upon at the time, throughout 1942 and 1943, British and Australian Army planning staff worked to exchange information and sought out personnel who might be suitable for operations in Borneo; meanwhile, the Allies established several organisations, such as Special Operations Australia and its military arm, Z Special Unit, to carry out covert operations in the Pacific. Execution[edit] Allied operations to capture Labuan and Brunei Bay were scheduled for mid-June. To support this, Operation Semut – derived from the Malay word for ant – was launched in mid-1945 by the Australian Services Reconnaissance Department (SRD) with two main objectives: to gather intelligence and to train the indigenous people in launching guerrilla warfare against the Japanese. The operation was initially commanded by Major G. S. Carter, a New Zealander serving in the Australian Army. but was divided into three main parties after a dispute between Carter and Harrisson over possession of the wireless transmission equipment.[2]: Semut 1 fell under the command of Major Tom Harrisson, Semut 2 under the command of Carter himself, and Semut 3 under Captain W. L. P. Sochon, who had previously served as a police officer in Sarawak before the war. All three had experience of the conditions in Borneo prior to the war, and understood the local culture and possessed some language skills. Japanese troops occupying the area were drawn from the 37th Army. Major G. Carter and Dita Bala, a chief from Long Dati Semut 1 would operate in the Trusan, Limbang and Padas valleys and their surrounds, Semut 2 in the Baram Valley and its surrounds, and Semut 3 in the Rajang Valley. Harrisson, led the advance party dropping into Bario in the Plain of Bah in the Kelabit highlands on 25 March 1945.[3] In late May Harrisson discovered the bigger and more prosperous Bawang Valley and decided to move his base to Belawit, in the Valley in Dutch Borneo. There, with the support of the local chief Penghulu Lasong Piri, and with local women delivering soil in reed baskets, they built a bamboo lined airstrip.[4] Carter was dropped by parachute into Bario in mid-April. After receiving support from the Kelabit people, his team moved to the Baram Valley where they established a base at Long Akah. Sochon then moved out from Semut 2's location and led the Semut 3 team to Belaga at Upper Rajang, with full support from the Kayan and Iban there. All the intelligence from these operations was relayed to General Thomas Blamey's Advanced Land Headquarters, locate at Morotai in the Halmahera. The major Australian Imperial Force (AIF) landing took place on 10 June 1945 at Labuan Island and Brunei Bay. When the AIF landed Harrisson’s Semut 1 men and their local guerrillas hit the Japanese inland outposts, taking settlements such as Lawas, Limbang and Ukong and cutting supplies to the Japanese on the coast. In a report written 12 days after the AIF landing, Harrisson noted that they had killed over 500 Japanese and cornered several hundred more. [5] The Semut 2 team captured a Japanese communications station at Long Lama several days before the Allied landings at Labuan and Brunei Bay, killing two Japanesea, wounding 3 and captured 2. On 9 June 1945, on the eve of the AIF landing, a Semut 1 team led by Sergeant Fred Sanderson, with the support of local area chief Penghulu Badak, attacked a Japanese garrison a short distance from Brunei Bay, killing eight Japanese, with the Iban warriors enthusiastically takin heads. [6]. On 26 April 1945, a plan named Stallion was implemented to collect intelligence from Operations Semut and Agas regarding the Japanese positions at Brunei Bay. This information was passed by radio to the 9th Division headquarters on Morotai Island to support future operations in the area by elements of the 20th and 24th Infantry Brigades, which landed in north Borneo on 10 June 1945. Information gathered included troop dispositions, identification of transportation routes and staging points, information about Allied prisoners of war in the area, and the locations of Japanese airfields, food supplies and ammunition dumps. Operation Semut 4 was split into two serials – 4A and 4B – which operated around Bintulu on the coast, having been inserted by sea, with the task of protecting the flank of the other three Semut parties. At Sarawak on 13 to 23 August 1945, Semut 4B sailed out of Labuan via HMAS Tigersnake and moored at Mukah. Party leader, Lieutenant Rowan Waddy, and Lieutenant Ron Hoey, paddling Hoehn folboats (collapsible canoes) journeyed along the Mukah River to engage, with the help of local natives, any remaining hostile Japanese groups. On the way they were threatened by a crocodile about the length of the folboat. Following the cessation of hostilities in mid-August, Semut operatives continued to work around Sapong under Harrisson until late October 1945, during which time they worked to secure the surrender of remaining Japanese troops who were engaged in fighting with local Bawang guerrillas. Throughout the operation, the inserted Semut personnel were resupplied by air by the Royal Australian Air Force's No. 200 Flight. Aftermath and impact[edit] Commemorative plaque for Operation Semut at Rockingham, Western Australia Assisted by the Agas and Semut operations, the Australian 9th Division was able to secure north Borneo, with major combat ending largely by July 1945. As the regular forces remained confined to the coastal areas, the Japanese moved inland and the irregular forces, particularly those assigned to Operation Semut, continued to play a role, calling in airstrikes on the withdrawing Japanese and working to restore civil administration. Following the cessation of hostilities, the regular Australian troops remained in north Borneo to restore law and order, and to facilitate the surrender of Japanese troops. But the inland war in Borneo did not end with the Japanese surrender on 15 August 1945. Two companies of Japanese led by Captain Tsunekichi Fijino refused to surrender, fleeing inland and pillaging the villages as they went. Harrisson refused to abandon the people who had supported his men and after a confrontation with senior officers was given permission to lead a small force to pursue the recalcitrant Japanese. In the mountains, Harrisson’s second in command mounted two ambushes of the Japanese forces. In late October 1945, two and a half months after the war’s official end, Fujino surrendered to Harrisson.[7] Extensive civic actions began even before the end of the war, with efforts being turned to rebuilding the oil facilities and other damaged infrastructure, establishing schools, providing medical care to local civilians and restoring the water supply. Martial law was initially imposed, but eventually a civil administration was established under the British Borneo Civil Affairs Unit. In analysing the operation, Ooi Keat Gin, writing in the Australian War Memorial Journal, concludes that both Operations Agas and Semut "achieved considerable results within a short period", and greatly assisted the wider Allied effort to secure north Borneo. Specifically, Semut 1 and 2 were considered to have achieved "remarkable success". In June 1945, Semut 1's elements were spread thinly, covering the entire northern Sarawak region and had an outpost at Pensiangan and as far as Tenom in North Borneo. They had also established several bases in Dutch Borneo. Sourced solely from the local population, the Australians were able to obtain information regarding Japanese positions and movements in Brunei and northern Sarawak, and information regarding prisoners of war and civilian internees in the region. About 600 natives were trained and supplied with weapons and ammunition. Semut 1 also carried out operations to focussed on disrupting Japanese subsistence operations and prevent the local population from providing labour to them. Semut 2 also expanded their operational area to Bintulu and Upper Rajang in central Sarawak and trained a 350-strong local guerrilla force. Semut 3 expanded their operational area to Kapit in central Sarawak. In 1959, Tom Harrisson, in summing up Z Special Units operations claimed that "[t]he unit had inflicted some 1,700 casualties on the Japs at the cost of some 112 white lives", stating that Semut 1 had accounted for over 1,000 of the total 1,700 Japanese fatal casualties. Jim Truscott places Japanese casualties as a result of Operation Semut at around 1,500 with 240 captured. These were inflicted by a force of around 82 Allied soldiers, and 200 local guerrillas. There were no casualties amongst the Z Special Unit members assigned to Semut, along about 30 local guerrillas were killed during the fighting. The information relayed by the local population, however, was sometimes erroneous, and the progress of Australian Imperial Force (AIF) in the region was hindered by incorrect information regarding Japanese strength and dispositions. In this regard, it has been concluded that Allied interrogators failed to assess the reliability of the information gathered before passing it to their headquarters. The local population was unable to differentiate facts and opinions from rumours circulating the region and subsequently passed incorrect information to the Australian forces. Due to Japanese counter-intelligence efforts, European officials could not be inserted into the Semut and Agas intelligence network to supervise the intelligence gathering.
|
Ozziesemutresearch (talk) 01:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Ozziesemutresearch. The best place for you discuss or to propose that changes you think should be made is going to be at Talk:Operation Semut since this is where editors knowledgable about the subject matter are likely going to be found. Although Wikipedia encourages us to be WP:BOLD and try to improve articles as needed, major changes (like what you seem to be asking about above) are probably better off dicussed first per WP:CAUTIOUS. It might also be easier for others to discuss your proposed changes if you do them one at a time. Total rewrites of articles can be hard to reach a consensus on since there's so many moving parts to consider, but smaller more specific changes tend to be much easier to deal with. Moreover, instead of simply saying add this to the article, it also helps to know why you think it should be added. Perhaps there's a way to modify the existing content to reflect the changes you want made instead of simply replacing it. Explaining why you think something should be removed or replaced will help others assess whether your proposed changes should be made. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
DARK MODE.
[edit]PLEASE ADD DARK MODE ON WIKIPEDIA.COM 666999joe (talk) 04:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @666999joe: Have you taken a look at Wikipedia:Dark mode yet? —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 04:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
How do I attribute content copied from one's userspace?
[edit]Hello,
An editor recently copied the contents of one of my userspace sandboxes to theirs, to work on it further and publish it as an article. After they finished developing it, they copied the entire contents of their sandbox again, over to a newly created article. Absolutely no page moves were used here.
They have not made any sort of attribution in any of the page's histories at all, nor at the article's talk page.
Also note that they have not made any edits to my sandbox at all, nor have I made edits to their sandbox.
So in a situation like this, how do I repair the insufficient attribution?
I feel like adding a copied template at the article's talk page that links to my userspace sandbox is kinda inappropriate, especially considering that I may delete my sandbox (using CSD G7). Speaking of which, is it safe to do so? Or must it be kept for attribution purposes?
P.s. I'm actually not bothered by them copying my content so much as I am by the simple fact that it's a violation of the attribution rules of the CC-BY license used here on Wikipedia.
Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 08:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- You can request that the histories get merged. See here: WP:HISTMERGE. Random person no 362478479 (talk) 08:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I found WP:RFHM, which looks like the right place to make a history merge request potentially involving more than two pages. — AP 499D25 (talk) 08:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
how to adjust
[edit]please help me to learn edit source: i am zeal Zealdesign (talk) 09:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Zealdesign Probably best to start at Help:Introduction and follow the links to tutorials for the source editor. If your first language is German, you might be better off at the German version of that page, linked there. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Reuse of Images
[edit]I would like to know if I can use images from wikipedia without breaking any copyright.
Let say I am building a website or a mobile app or writing a blog and I want to use a wiki image on it. Can I do that?
Should I mention the author of the picture at the end of the article or somewhere in my blog? Or would be enough to add something like "all images are sources from Wikipedia" at the end of the article, page or app? Thanks 106.180.248.49 (talk) 09:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please see WP:REUSE and c:COM:REUSE. The images held at Wikimedia Commons are generally fine for use with attribution (technically CC BY SA or sometimes Public domain) but some images on English Wikipedia are WP:FAIRUSE and might be copyright if used elsewhere. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Link to category page
[edit]Is there a way to link to a WP category page without resorting to an external link? It can be done for a Commons category, thus: C:Category:Traditional board games; I tried WP:Category:Traditional board games but as you can see, no luck. There is a corresponding WP page here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Traditional board games. --136.56.52.157 (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Did you try Category:Traditional board games (
[[:Category:Traditional board games]]
)? See Help:Categories, and Help:Link. Bazza (talk) 16:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)- Oh. Colon without the "WP" -- thanks! 136.56.52.157 (talk) 16:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
my company
[edit]why isn't my company coming up in wikipedia? 2603:7000:2F00:321:6942:C3E:B49B:426E (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Not every company is considered notable by Wikipedia's definition. If it is notable, someone will get around to writing an article on it eventually. This isn't social media, the mere existence of an organization is not sufficient cause to have an article on it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- There are approximately 334 million companies in the world. There are 6.6 million articles in Wikipedia, and less than 600,000 of them are about companies. We only have articles that meet our notability requirements. See WP:NCORP. -Arch dude (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Just curious how you got that figure(334 million). 331dot (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC)