Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trucking industry in the United States/1
Appearance
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch •
- Result: FGAN endorsed; withdrawn by nominator PeterSymonds | talk 19:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Reviewer simply delisted the artile without giving time to fix simple problems such as citing sources for obvious claims. Reviewer had issues with lengthy list of terms, which could easily be moved to a new article. Reviewer noted there was "too much" statistical information, which could easily be fixed with a few days of editing. Simply stated.... I want a second opinion.
- Endorse fail. The reviewer made the right call. The article is progressing nicely but still has a way to go. Keep up the good work and you'll get it up to GA standards, at which point you can re-nominate the article at GAN. Majoreditor (talk) 04:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak endorse: It's always a judgement call as to whether an article gets held or failed, and it will vary depending on the reviewer. I'd rather see reviewers erring on the side of hold, but I assume User:Cryptic C62 felt there was too much to be addressed in the 7-day hold period. I do wish you all the best in getting this impressive article to GA though. Regards, EyeSereneTALK 12:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I have made significant edits and added citations to this article since it has been first reviewed. Every issue the last reviewer had with the article has been addressed, except for the lack of "economic impact" section which the reviewer noted would not necessarily prevent it from reaching GA status. I am working on that part... however, every single statement has been sourced and cited. If someone would be kind enough to re-review this article I would appreciate it! --ErgoSum88 (talk) 09:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- The best way to have the article reviewed again will be to re-nominate it at GAN. Majoreditor (talk) 02:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Withdraw Okay, I'll do that. On that note, I withdraw my reassessment. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 08:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)