Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Team Fortress 2/1

Team Fortress 2[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted Clear consensus for such. Wugapodes (talk) 21:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's two or so different "maintenance" templates (expand section, etc) on this page. It doesn't read that well either, especially the plot and post release sections. I believe it doesn't meet the "well written" section of WP:WIAGA and it doesn't stay on topic (3B). Ana r chyte 11:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a number of other templates to display several more issues with the article. As it stands, I would pull this from GA, but we can give the editors time to work on the issues. I am positive that they can be fixed quite swiftly. Another issue I found is: Under Final design it says when the game was not announced, but nowhere does it state, when and where is was eventually announced. Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delist The article has too many "citation needed" tags and cleanup tags to be in GA shape.Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:04, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Cleanup tags are pretty much a no-go on good articles, this should definitely be demoted. BlookerG ^talk 20:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Every section bar Marketing needs work to meet GA standards. --The1337gamer (talk) 11:55, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Article arguably meets the quickfail criteria. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delist The cleanup tags say it all. Also, reading through the article, it is not very well-written, and per the nominator, it's not really focused at all. This would meet the quick fail criteria if nominated now. Johanna (aka BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 03:48, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]