Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Outnumbered/1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

1. The whole article needs to be copy-edited, especially the lead and Reception sections.
2. There shouldn't be any references in the lead section. The lead section also doesn't summarize the body of the article well enough.
3. Bare URLs are present in the reference section.
4. There is an original research tag present.
5. The main ratings section should be incorporated in this article.
6. The Ratings section in the Reception section should summarise all the series, not just the first one.
7. The critical reception section should summarise what the reviewers said, keeping quotations to a minimum.
8. The Awards section needs padding out. It consists of paragraphs which are just one sentence long!
9. The DVD releases section needs references.

I'll conduct a more thorough review once the concerns above have been addressed.   Tentinator   10:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

• Just noting I took the two minutes necessary to fix the bare URLs and find a ref for the original research tag. SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

The more significant issues haven't been addressed so I'm going to delist this.   Tentinator   18:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)