Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/O'Brien-class destroyer/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
This article contains many uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. While the information might be verified by the subsequent citations, that source will need to be checked to ensure it verifies all the information in the preceeding paragraph. Z1720 (talk) 22:17, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- The majority of uncited paragraphs were caused by the breaking up of the existing paragraphs rather than the addition of new information. Going off the revision from the GA promotion I have re-added the citations used for these sections. The other uncited statement, in background, was also uncited at the time of promotion. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have now added the other citation from Friedman (available here). Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Are we still considering navweaps a RS these days? I was thinking that we didn't. There are a few citations to that source. Hog Farm Talk 23:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have removed navweaps and the information it cited. It was technical detail on the guns which seemed to be far too much considering we have a separate article for the gun. Agree that the source itself is nowadays subpar. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)