Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Live action role-playing game/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
There are uncited passages throughout the article, including entire paragraphs. The lead does not summarise all the major points in the article. There are some sections and paragraphs that are quite long; these should be split up or reduced. Z1720 (talk) 17:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep WP:SOFIXIT applies here, I was able to delete the offending sections in a few minutes, raising serious concerns about why this WP:GAR was necessary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: There's also a "needs update" tag in the "Fest" section. Was any of the information taken out important to fulfiling the completeness (3a) requirement of WP:WIAGA? Z1720 (talk) 04:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Frankly, I have no idea why that tag is there, I have removed it as it appears unnecessary and pointless.
- None of the information removed seems critical. I looked for sources to replace the removed info, and came up with nothing, so it seems to have been original research. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: There's also a "needs update" tag in the "Fest" section. Was any of the information taken out important to fulfiling the completeness (3a) requirement of WP:WIAGA? Z1720 (talk) 04:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.