Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ko Olina Station and Center/1

Ko Olina Station and Center

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delist due to the article being merged. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that this meets GA criteria. Lonely Planet is a tourism website and doesn't seem sufficient for supporting notability. Most of the other sources are similar tourism blurbs too. There's very little info about the mall, as the article is only two paragraphs long. It doesn't seem to be a thorough enough look, especially when compared to other mall articles. tl;dr: comprehensiveness and sources. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

just a quick note: GAR is not the place to talk about notability, and 'comprehensiveness' is the FA criterion. Good articles only need to be 'broad'. In practice these two terms mean the same for articles with few sources available. Femke (talk) 07:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sourcing is still sorely lacking, as most of it is just tourism bureau websites. I still think the coverage is far from broad enough for a GA. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TenPoundHammer, Femkemilene I've boldly merged into the Ko Olina article. There is no longer an article to be GA. (t · c) buidhe 05:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.