Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hot chocolate/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted per below citation issues, especially concerning WP:MEDRS. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
A GA from 2008. Some problems include uncited statements like
- However, mixes can vary widely (between countries and often between brands) in ingredients included, their ratio and their quality.
- Today, hot chocolate is consumed for pleasure rather than medicinally, but new research suggests that there may be other health benefits attributed to the drink
- ...hydrogenated oils, or fats.
- Some brands also contain hydrogenated oils and fats, the most common of which are coconut derivatives.
There are also some other problems such as
- I'm not convinced that the ingredients section is broad enough. It barely mentions any addons and could probably be expanded.
- Several negative effects[which?] may be...
If these can fixed that would be great. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- I was intending to close, but am not convinced, so additional opinions are needed to make a decision. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like this one might need to be delisted. There's not enough information about global usage or about terminology/ingredients (which should really be one section) to meet broad coverage. Its health information should also be subject to stricter citation requirements per WP:MEDRS, meaning that there shouldn't be any citation issues in that section. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.