Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Beholder (horse)/1

Beholder (horse)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept. charlotte ^👸♥ 05:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "Breeding career" section is unsourced and reads like a list because there are multiple one-sentence paragraphs. The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article as "Backgound" and "Breeding career" information is missing. Z1720 (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like scads of cruft has been added since the GAN.[1] Will do a simple revert for now. Montanabw^(talk) 18:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up did some extensive cleanup to remove the fancruft. Look better now? Montanabw^(talk) 18:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@Montanabw: It looks much better. Was any of the removed information important information to keep for completeness? Z1720 (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, is there any post-2016 information to add to the article? Z1720 (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: I took all the breeding history stuff and consolidated what was actually notable — with sources — into the section I renamed “honors and legacy”. I also added the 2022 Hall of Fame indiction there, in the lede and in the infobox.Let me know if that works. Montanabw^(talk) 03:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Concerns have been addressed and resolved. Z1720 (talk) 15:47, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.