Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Wipeout/archive1

10 articles

Wipeout

Wipeout 2097

Wipeout 64

Wipeout 3

Wipeout Fusion

Wipeout Pure

Wipeout Pulse

Wipeout HD

Wipeout 2048

Wipeout Omega Collection

Nominating this because Wipeout Omega Collection has been greatly sourced since the last time this was discussed and thus stands as its own article. As such this topic is incomplete. GamerPro64 01:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove: the article is clearly notable and it not being up to GA-status or even nominated means this topic should be demoted. --K. Peake 07:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove~~: the series certainly requires the latest installment. Sure hope someone picks this up! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctantly, I don't think I'll have enough time to save this GT by bringing Wipeout Omega Collection to GA. I will of course renominate this once I've done so. ♦ jaguar 16:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Jaguar I have already cast my vote, but I'd like to remind you that the retention period for topics is up to three months. --K. Peake 08:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of the retention period. I may be a bit rusty after three years but I'll make a start on the article hopefully tonight. ♦ jaguar 08:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguar I meant three months after release, as that is what the criterion says if you look. It is obviously much longer since the collection, but the pass of this topic previously was not an error since that was before the article in discussion existed. --K. Peake 11:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Remove~~ Sadly the topic no longer meets 1.d. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 04:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/continue with supp. nom, now that the collection is a GA, it now meets 1.d. Spy-cicle💥 ^Talk? 15:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove~~ Even though I vote reluctantly. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Director comment' - noticed Wipeout Omega Collection is nominated at GAN now so we'll have to keep this nomination up pending the result of the review. GamerPro64 18:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and then do a supplemental nomination for Wipeout Omega Collection. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 16:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake, Bryanrutherford0, Spy-cicle, and MarioSoulTruthFan: the collection has been promoted to GA status and I would like for you to reassess the topic. GamerPro64 18:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: That resolves the concern here, I think! Should this then be moved to a supplemental nomination? -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 18:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I await when a supplemental nomination has been at least submitted for the new GA, then I will re assess. --K. Peake 19:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because Wipeout Omega Collection's now GA. «2nd|ias» 03:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It resolves the issue. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:11, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The collection's now GA, so there's no issue anymore. AryKun (talk) 03:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With that article being GA now, the issue's moot. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 19:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All articles are GA now.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closed with a consensus to keep – Aza24 (talk) 02:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]