Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Star Trek
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The portal was promoted by OhanaUnited 04:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]
| Participation Guide | |
|---|---|
| Support | |
| Cirt - Support as co-nominator | |
| Miyagawa - Support as co-nominator | |
| Sven Manguard - Support | |
| Jj98 - Support | |
| Neutral/No vote | |
| REVUpminster - Commented | |
| Oppose | |
| none | |
Co-nomination. (This is a co-nomination with Miyagawa.) I've got another Featured Portal candidate discussion going on now for Portal:Technology, but since that one and this one are both co-nominations with other editors, I thought it'd be okay to nominate this 2nd one. We believe the portal meets the standards for Featured Portal status. Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 02:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Notified: User talk:Miyagawa, User talk:Cirt, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/American television task force, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science Fiction, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Media franchises, Portal talk:Star Trek. — Cirt (talk) 02:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC) [reply]
- Support, as co-nominator. I did the re-structuring process in preparation for quality improvement, and Miyagawa was quite helpful with addressing issues as they cropped up and filling in selections throughout, not to mention contributing lots of great quality content. — Cirt (talk) 02:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, as co-nominator. With a big thanks to Cirt for being the driving force behind this as I inevitably got distracted along the way. :) Miyagawa (talk) 13:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - As this is a summary of Star Trek pages the franchise article is listed as Star Trek. I have queried this on the talk page but have been ignored therefore should the portal show it as Star Trek|Star Trek franchise within[[]] REVUpminster (talk) 15:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- @REVUpminster - I don't see any prior comments by you, which talk page are you referring to? And can you please clarify what you would like to see changed, I'm a bit confused? Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 19:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, I see your comment from 28 November 2013. I think that is an issue for the article, not the portal. The portal introduction simply reflects the WP:LEAD text of the main article. That issue could be resolved at the talk page of the main article in accordance with WP:COMMONNAME. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 20:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - While I wish that the selected pictures section was better, there is little or nothing that we could feasibly do to improve it. The things we'd need are all copyrighted for a very long time. Other than that, my concerns were addressed in the Peer Portal Review. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks very much, Sven Manguard, for the Support. Much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per nom. JJ98 (Talk) 08:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the Support, Jj98. — Cirt (talk) 07:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.