Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Featured log/December 2009

The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The portal was promoted by Cirt 05:54, 4 December 2009 [1].

Portal:Nevada

This is one of my best portals, and is accompanied by sufficient selections of articles, images, quotes, DYKs, and panoramas among other things. I've intentionally left the image captions short, because I have noticed that they tend to overlap with the articles otherwise. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support Couple things though:

I think the image descriptions could be a BIT longer.
There's no Wikiproject Las Vegas or Wikiproject Gambling? Huh.
The DYKs could use a bit more. 4-per-set would probably better, and a few more sets where possible. Staxringold _talk^contribs 19:48, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support In my opinion it satisfies all FP criteria. (However Wikiproject Las Vegas should be added to the list of projects.) Ruslik_Zero 18:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Certainly 3 hooks per sets of DYKs is appropriate, but the amount of total sets at Portal:Nevada/Did you know could be doubled, from 5 sets of 3 to at least 10 sets of 3. Cirt (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added another set. I'll continue to search for more. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Has only 7 quotes and 6 DYK sets. Surely there's a bit more? Otherwise looks good. Durova³⁶⁶ 06:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doing... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any progress on this? Cirt (talk) 16:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support corrected a couple of typos that I noticed when shamelessly pilfering the framework for my first attempt; otherwise, looks good (though more quotes and DYK would be great if possible). Bencherlite ^Talk 08:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.