Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Failed log/May 2007
Appearance
{{portal|Graffiti}} I've worked hard on this portal and feel it is of an exellent standard. Regards, Dfrg.msc 04:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Nominate and Support - Dfrg.msc 00:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment - Just a few comments on a pretty good portal
- There is a red link in the Graffiti Articles that require expansion section, if it needs expansion it should already be an article.
- Several of the Associated Wikimedia link go to blank pages, either remove them or link them to created pages.
- The More... link in the Selected article is in bold while the Nominatons... in the selected pic is not. Also they are no aligned to either side and look strange.
- why is the selected picture only 20px you cant see it.
- Also a possibility of adding Nomination sections to the quote and DYK sections.
Just a few points but a good portal.. Hossen27 03:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's basically been just me working on it. I'll try to address all the issues as they come. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 00:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Object There are still a number of things in the review that didn't get done.
- Selected article - An archive and nomination page will need to be created and linked.
- Related portals - All pics should be the same size,
- Selected lists - They should not be selected, you should list all lists(if possible). And all list lists should be treated the same, not "see also".
- Selected pic - Size formating. You have two separate descriptions, the "Street Art in Munich" and then the one labeled Description, narrow it down to one. An archive and nomination page will need to be created and linked.
- You will of course have to find more content to add to the portal, and with it a rotation scheme.
Joe I 20:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- Topics - A topics box is needed. Joe I 02:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok Joe, I've worked hard to make the portal better. Is there anything else you would ask? Dfrg.msc 23:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Ouch. That'll take a few days. Dfrg.msc 08:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)- Done. Dfrg.msc 00:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Now I've made it even better. Dfrg.msc 03:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Done. Dfrg.msc 00:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok Joe, I've worked hard to make the portal better. Is there anything else you would ask? Dfrg.msc 23:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The layout is a little wide. It does not show up on my browser using standard settings without scrolling to the right. You might shrink it a little. --יהושועEric 04:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- I reduced it by 1pt. Is it better now? Dfrg.msc 03:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I think it reached featured portal quality. —KGV (Talk) 12:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I suggest withdrawing and running a Portal peer review as it needs some improvement. feydey 13:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC) P.S. What's an "Achieve"? feydey 13:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)