Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Failed log/April 2017
These two nominations were not concluded before the featured portal process ceased operating.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Worked to bring the portal back to an acceptable status and it seems to fit the featured portal standards. The topic is broad as it covers an entire academic field that has a large amount of quality content. I have queued content for the next three months and will continue to add more as time goes on. Wugapodes (talk) 04:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comments by Dharmadhyaksha
- There are many pages related to this portal that are not categorized under Category:Linguistics portal; such as Portal:Linguistics/Featured phone/January 2016, Portal:Linguistics/Featured article/January 2016 and tons of others. Such uncategorized pages are difficult to track.
- Category added. Wugapodes (talk) 16:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- How many featured article, featured phones and sets of DYKs are included in the portal? The numbers might help reviewers in gauging.
- The features are manually selected and included rather than being chosen from a list. Features are currently queued for three months. The Linguistics WikiProject lists 42 articles at or above GA quality and 258 at B class. Wugapodes (talk) 16:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Are all featured articles actually featured? Means how many of those are FAs, GAs or what classes are they?
- I have changed the wording from "featured" to "selected" as not all articles selected are "featured articles". Selected articles are required to be at least B-class to ensure quality but also allow a larger pool of content for nominators to choose from. Preference is given to articles GA and above. The phones are selected without regard to quality of the article as it is the phone that is being selected rather than the article. Wugapodes (talk) 16:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Wugapodes: The "will continue to add more as time goes on" approach doesn't seem to work. There is just a redlink in the selected article box for May (as was for April). It would be better if there were some (at least 30) pages, which would appear randomly on the page. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Armbrust: You are correct. I've been working to convert more of them to random displays and forgot about the articles. They've been redone. There are currently 17 pages, I will work to add more. Wugapodes (talk) 19:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose the nomination has stalled, clearly, but in any event there is insufficient content: just 2 DYK rotations, and commented-out sections for featured biography and picture (also for news, but that's not an issue these days). That leaves the page looking very unbalanced between left and right. BencherliteTalk (using his alt account Bencherheavy) 12:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Bencherlite/heavy. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 10:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This portal meets all the criteria for featured status. All information listed on its main page are featured and the best content related to Europe on Wikipedia. --HombreHistorico (talk) 16:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose far too little quality content to represent an entire continent. The portal represents "Europe" through a mere 10 biographies, for instance, one of which is Kierkegaard which was delisted from FA status over 6 years ago. So the claim that "all information listed on its main page are featured" is false. I found and removed 2 non-free images as well before giving up. Needs more work and more content. BencherliteTalk 20:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)