Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/mountain

Mont Blanc

Reason: Very clear and encyclopedic image.
Articles this image appears in: Mont Blanc European Union
Creator: User:Nattfodd

Support as nominator - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support Impressive..... but how about crop the bottom a bit? the bottom left dark bit of snow is sorta ruining the beautiful scene. Dengero (talk) 23:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No sense of scale, very bad focus on mont blanc itself :D\=< (talk) 04:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - very impressive photo --Cradel 11:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I prefer these alternatives. Pstuart84 Talk 14:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support alternative 2 - An amazing panorama with excellent photographic quality -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose original, support either alternative. The original isn't nearly as good as the alternatives. Cacophony (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Its a nice photo, but... I agree there is no sense of scale. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 11:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support any they are all great mountain shots among wikipedia's best. Our standards seem to be getting out of hand. de Bivort 16:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 2--CPacker (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support ALT2 Captivating. Lots to look at and ponder(that 2nd column from the left needs some repair!). Top notch. --Mike Spenard (talk) 07:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support – To me, the lack of any human presence and a sense of scale adds to the charm of this picture. Excellent quality and a captivating photo. Centy – reply• contribs – 12:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:PanoMontBlancHDR_edit_1.jpg MER-C 11:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]