Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Lower Yellowstone Fall-1200px.jpg

Reason: This was one of those images that originally passed its FP nomination when the criteria were not as stringent as it is now. Please view in full size: There are a lot of jpeg artifacts and noise in the clouds, it lacks sharpness, and it's not particularly strong color-wise. All of these facts are more significant due to the image's size, which is just barely above the required dimensions. Smaller images typically hide sharpness and jpeg issues, but they're just as noticeable here.
Nominator: DMCer ™

Delist — DMCer ™ 07:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Did you notify the photographer? MER-C 13:27, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep listed until there's proof that DMCer has notified the photographer on either his en. or commons. talk page; delist per nom unless photo can be fixed by its creator. -- Mike (Kicking222) 21:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Grant 1 year delist protection and extend that to 2 years if the nominator doesn't notify the photographer by signed courier within 8 hours, this is really just unacceptable. :D\=< (talk) 04:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa there chief; I've notified him. Honest mistake, I lost track of one too many windows (that can happen when you have 140 tabs open). —DMCer ™ 05:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - Don't worry, ffroth is a tad on the humourist side. 140 tabs, eh? thats... a lot o.0: --Mad Tinman _T _C 23:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - And for any budding tab counters using Firefox, here's TabCount for status bar, and Tab Counter for menu bar! Samsara noadmin (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - I think when we were going for the 500,000th article on Wikipedia, I had about 100 new article windows open at a single time, and then tabbed between them to save them all at once... I still didn't get it :) — BRIAN0918 • 2008-02-07 16:03Z
Evaluate different version I'm surprised that old version is still around. A higher res and cleaned-up version is here: Image:Lower Yellowstone Fall.JPG. --mav (talk) 05:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's definitely higher-res, but I think the same problems plague this one as well. Why was the smaller one nominated for FP instead?—DMCer ™ 08:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delist The new one is just as badly artifacted as the old. I believe all the proper protocol has been followed here, so I'm going to go with Delist. This would never even make it past PPR on today's Wiki. Clegs (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist easily reproduced/improved. Cacophony (talk) 03:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, not that exceptional. --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted MER-C 06:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]