Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Eiffel Tower

Reason: Very blurry; more notable for artistic lighting than encyclopeidic value.
Nominator: Pstuart84 Talk

Delist — Pstuart84 Talk 21:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Blurry, but high rez outweighs that. Good composition: artsy lighting, but perfect angle for detail. It isn't perfect, but it is really good. At least until Diliff can be dispatched...--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 01:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is one of my favorite pictures. I forgot it was this unsharp, but otherwise, it's very nice, mainly because of the cute composition. Blieusong (talk) 06:38, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep It's a good photo, but the sharpness is a little iffy for a featured picture. crassic!^[talk] 17:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't find sharpness bad at all; it's eight megapixels, and the level of detail in the picture is comparable to recent FPs. Thegreenj 22:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. Mfield (talk) 04:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a little blurry admittedly but still overall a good picture and fp worthy. Cat-five - talk 06:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist An important and interesting subject gets the dreaded sillouette treatment because someone notices the sky is a different colour at dawn. All detail of the subject is lost behind an awful glare. Delist and take this and others of its ilk out of Wiki articles Motmit (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kept MER-C 12:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]