Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wrentit

Support as nominator Raul654 (talk) 18:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Almost but not quite as sharp as I would like. Some may prefer a tighter crop.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Not very sharp, and the subject is a bit small and to the side. TheOtherSiguy (talk) 20:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very pretty picture, high quality and very encyclopedic. J Milburn (talk) 22:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Not as sharp as I would like. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line}_{Review Me!} 03:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support It's a good image that I believe displays the subject well. Sharpness is sub-par, so it's only a weak support from me. Sharpness aside, good work. Capital photographer (talk) 13:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral While this does lack sharpness it is a very difficult shot to get. Sam Barsoom 20:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
weak support edit, neutral original per requests for a tighter crop on the bird. Matt Deres (talk) 22:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. The picture is quite encyclopedic, but the tail feathers are out of focus and the background is rather busy and distracting. NauticaShad es 01:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose, per Nauticashades.--ragesoss (talk) 20:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus MER-C 12:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]