Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/World War I Recruitment Poster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2016 at 08:57:39 (UTC)

Original – UK. Alfred Leete (1882-1933). Britons (Kitchener) wants you (British / Kitchener / needs you). 1914 (reprint), 74 x 50 cm. (Slg.Nr. 552). The title page of the "London Opinion" in 1914 for the first time printed images showing popular by its command posts in colonial wars War Minister Lord Kitchener. The advertising psychologically pioneering subject of fixing the viewer with the look in perspective enlarged outstretched forefinger was copied in several countries - the most successful in the United States and the Soviet Union.
alt 1
Reason
One of those iconic war recruitment posters, this one coming from the London Opinion and making a splash at the commons where it is already featured.
Articles in which this image appears
1914 in the United Kingdom, 38th (Welsh) Infantry Division, Alfred Leete], British Armed Forces, British people, British propaganda during World War I, Hedd Wyn, Herbert Kitchener, History of propaganda, History of public relations, Index finger, King's Regiment (Liverpool), Kitchener's Army, London Opinion, Lord Kitchener Wants You, Military recruitment, Recruitment in the British Army, Recruitment to the British Army during the First World War, World War I in popular culture
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War I
Creator
I think Alfred Leete
Done: c:File:Kitchener London Opinion Cover 1914 by Alfred Leete.jpg - It's very good in my opinion, but obviously not to be considered as alt as not yet used in any articles. - Wolftick (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Wolftick: You known, it helps immensely when the guy who nominated the image is informed that there be a new version. I've put the alt in an article, so its now an eligible FPC candidate - not that it will be of much use, since we are also out of voting time here. TomStar81 (Talk) 02:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@TomStar81: Sorry. I considered the availability of a similar but superior (in my opinion) image a reason for my oppose rather than a potential alt. I uploaded it because I had already downloaded and converted it for myself so thought it was worthwhile, but didn't plan on updating the relevant articles myself for the time being so didn't think it was eligible for, or relevant to, nomination other than if people might want to look in order to assess my judgement. In retrospect I realise it may have been useful to ping you to let you know of the existence of the image. - Wolftick (talk) 04:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 09:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]