Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Whirligig

I like the composition and color of this picture. Appears in whirligig and Kinetic art. Created by User:Rklawton.

Nominate and support. - Ravedave ^{(help name my baby)} 04:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - my photo is also used here [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5] Rklawton 05:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - because subject is so interesting. A bit smaller than I'd like though = good thing it's 1200x800 and not 800x1200 Debivort 20:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oppose - sorry - I should have realized the cross-bar texture was an artifact. Debivort 22:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support per quality of picture. Sharkface217 23:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 1. I actually thought there were wires wrapped around the rods, but it's just aliasing. This needs to be in higher resolution with all those sharp-contrasted diagonals. 2. Looks static, so really doesn't express "kinetic" very well. 3. No wow. ~ trialsanderrors 04:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object some of the rods look weird.--DaveOinSF 05:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. The quality is good, but the size and the confusing aspect of the picture detract from it. NauticaShad e s 07:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Great composition and interesting subject. But lots and lots of pixellation along the horizontal bars. It takes away from the pic at full size for me. Would definitely support if this were fixed in a larger version. tiZom_(2¢) 14:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose due to technical issues (probably as a result of downsampling?). howch e ng {chat} 01:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per above comments (mostly technical issues) - Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 02:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for small resolution and anti-aliasing on horizontal bars. Both of these make me think that User:Rklawton, the photographer, has a higher resolution copy sitting around somewhere. I might support a max-resolution copy of this, with no anti-aliasing. Snurks^TC 08:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's aliasing- antialiasing refers to various techniques to try to reduce those industry-termed "jaggies" --⁪froth^{T C} 21:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per aliasing on bars. If a larger version is available without aliasing then I may weak support, though it is a little dark in spots. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 21:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
oppose. noticable aliasing that could be antialiased smoothly into the sky. Also kind of boring --⁪froth^{T C} 21:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Isn't this a three-dimension work of art and thus used under {{Statue}} instead of being free? Hbdragon88 06:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]