Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Watching the Dancers
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2024 at 22:19:34 (UTC)
- Reason
- striking, often reproduced/printed photo by a notable photographer, now in a restored version
- Articles in which this image appears
- Walpi, Arizona, Photogravure
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Traditional dress
- Creator
- Edward S. Curtis, restored by W.carter
- Support as nominator – Cart (talk) 22:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Despite the image only being a photogravure, it's on the Library of Congress list of "Miscellaneous Items in High Demand". Luckily, a second photo from the same event is preserved as a photo print, so I could use that as reference when I restored this one. Cart (talk) 22:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Question Why has the writing around the original been removed? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- The writing has to do with the printing company who printed the photogravure, not the photographer. As mentioned above only this photogravure has survived, not the original plate or a photo print. The photographer only made small number notes on his prints, as can be seen on the print of the other photo of the scene. Cart (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; so the 'original' here is the photogravure which should not be cropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think there's arguments. I usually go with "Is there a salvagable border?" Because weird grey paper (due to being a black-and-white-scan, when paper tends to have a very slight yellow tone) isn't really worth saving. I'd say Support, as long as the text cropped is in the description. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 08:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; so the 'original' here is the photogravure which should not be cropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- The writing has to do with the printing company who printed the photogravure, not the photographer. As mentioned above only this photogravure has survived, not the original plate or a photo print. The photographer only made small number notes on his prints, as can be seen on the print of the other photo of the scene. Cart (talk) 14:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment – I like this a lot. It puts the 'people' in the 'place', their ancestral place. Bammesk (talk) 01:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC) . . . . . Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great image. – Yann (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Can the caption text be tightened, and also a date (even just year) be added to it? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 02:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- @W.carter: Little advice: when the Library of Congress - and only the Library of Congress - write "c1906" as a date, they mean COPYRIGHT 1906, not circa. It's one of the weird quirks of the archive. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 09:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Btw Did you know that this hairstyle was the inspiration for Princess Leia's hairdo? [1] If this is featured and a TFP, might May the 4th be a good date for it? :-D (half kidding, half serious) Cart (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I know you're half-joking, but I would oppose this. I'm certainly not someone who believes that cultural appropriation is inherently evil and colonialist, but I think it is important not to make the appropriative use the primary one in which a cultural tradition is understood. Particularly for something like this that is coming out of a now severely endangered indigenous culture, the original context should always be primary, the later reference secondary. Anyway, this is a great and important image--thanks for restoring it and nominating it. blameless 19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your input, and I agree with your reasoning. I come from a culture where we freely float odd ideas and we like to brainstorm, to see if anything constructive can come from it. I know that is not generally embraced on wiki, hence my caveats. I was sort of going for the boost a big present-day thing could have for highlighting what you rightly call a "severely endangered indigenous culture" in some way. Cart (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Blameless. Bammesk (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. No brainstorming here. Cart (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Promoted File:Watching the Dancers by Edward S. Curtis 1906 - restored.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 19:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)