Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shortfin mako shark jaw

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2013 at 05:16:09 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Mediran (t • c) 05:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -good quality and good EV.-Godot13 (talk) 01:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It does not miss a tooth. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could use a size indication or scale. Lycaon (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The scale is at the bottom right of the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That scale is not visible in small previews (even at 1000px). J Kadavoor J e e 03:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is voluntarily scale that is unobtrusive. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would prefer a bigger scale, but at least it has one. Good example of a shark jaw. Mattximus (talk) 23:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A more visible scale is necessary, otherwise I don't know exactly what I'm looking at. The one currently there is absurdly small. Who is actually going to notice that? -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 03:30, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please add the size in file description. J Kadavoor J e e 12:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Good idea --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:14, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support :- Bellus Delphina ^talk 09:37, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image, high EV. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:31, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Isurus oxyrinchus Machoire.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]