Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rose-ringed parakeet

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 May 2021 at 09:00:01 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. To me, it fails criterion #3. The picture is not compelling, not making the viewer want to know more. It is nothing special. enjoyer -- talk 02:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre comment. The most important thing a viewer wants to know when reading an article about an animal is what it looks like. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When they see the picture first, they may not be interested enough to read the article. enjoyer -- talk 23:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support high EV (t · c) buidhe 20:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose WB problem on both bird photos, eagle and this. --Petar Milošević (talk) 04:34, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- WB problem? I don't see it. First of all, WB is very subjective, second, it depends on monitor setting/calibration, third, it depends on the lighting condition both during shooting and viewing. Can you please specify exactly what's wrong with the WB? --Janke | Talk 12:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Janke sure. Sky goes to Magenta-cyan and birds green it not such lively as on other photos. Still far, while eagle is a bit better. --Petar Milošević (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I have made a small adjustment to the colour balance Petar Milošević. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Obviously my RAM was full and i saw older shot. Armbrust could you revoke the result. --Petar Milošević (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good EV. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Armbrust: Could you look at Petar's request please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Promoted File:Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri borealis) male Jaipur 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]