Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/QR Code Structure

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 May 2011 at 02:06:32 (UTC)

Support as nominator --—James ^{(Talk • Contribs)} • 12:06pm • 02:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The original version of the image has errors in it, I have made and uploaded a new version which fixes these issues. - Zephyris _Talk 08:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt This is very imformative to someone technical desiring knowledge on the subject. I was curious if we could have the decoded version and format information displayed somehow to improve the usefulness. --Chrismiceli (talk) 20:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt JJ Harrison (talk) 07:48, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Alt. An excellent illustration, assuming the content is accurate. However, item no. 4 in the legend is accompanied by a little 4x4 chequered pattern, which kind of suggests that the pattern is a required pattern, which does not seem to be the case. And the green border should be toned down a bit; it's a bit strong. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt as above, but I agree about the green border. For a quiet zone, that's a pretty loud colour. Cowtowner (talk) 15:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Why does the font look so terrible in the new version? The kerning is horrible. Kaldari (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the original image the text had been converted to paths, in the new one it is actually a text object. Blame Wikipedia's .svg rendering if you don't like the kerning :) it does, however, keep it very readable even at small sizes. - Zephyris _Talk 12:40, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:QR Code Structure Example 2.svg --Makeemlighter (talk) 04:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is fucking genius!:!