Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Peterborough, New Hampshire Sign

Not sure if it's good enough for featured article, but I thought i'd give it a shot. I shot it and it is the anchoring point for Peterborough, New Hampshire at the current time. Karmafist 20:47, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate and support. - Karmafist 20:47, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Exposure, composition and size are way below standard. The pic does not seem striking at all, nor does it contribute significantly to the article about that town. This is not fixable at all(except for exposure maybe), so I might just as well strongly oppose right now... --Dschwen 08:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. see above and below and the picture. --Dschwen 07:55, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sorry: whatever it may do for the article in question, as a picture it just isn't interesting. William M. Connolley 16:36, 23 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose I can't think of a single feature of this photo that would merit it for Featured Picture status. D e nni ☯ 02:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I don't think I need to explain myself. Enochlau 06:21, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Same reasons as already given by everyone else. —Vanderdecken^∫ξφ 12:56, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Oppose This image is of exceedingly inferior quality and does not add anything significant to Wikipedia. --mdd4696 18:26, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
( − ) Oppose. Can't see what's exceptional here. --Lysy ^(talk) 19:35, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 04:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]