Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nice at Night delist

Nice at Night

I'm glad to be nominating a picture that does meet the size requirements, but simply does not meet the other criteria. This image does not only have glaringly obvious (not to mention distracting) blown highlights, but there are jpeg artifacts very visible in the bottom right in the trees and the distant hills, as well as the background being very unsharp. The motion blur of the cars is also distracting and is not being used to illustrate anything. The compistion is also just too busy.

Delist. - NauticaShad e s 16:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delist, just blurry all around Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist JanSuchy 20:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Nice pun on "glaringly" obvious blown highlights :-P • Le on 05:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Terrible picture. The blown highlights are very distracting here. | AndonicO ^{Talk | Sign Here} 10:32, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Blown hightlights. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted per unanimous consensus after 8 days --NMChico24 21:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]