Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/New England Tree Frog

Support as nominator liquidGhoul (talk) 11:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose DOF is too small, bad lightning, seems to be “over-flashed” (see the eye of the frog). Altogether not enough. —αἰτίας •discussion• 11:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I don't see what's wrong with the eye of the frog. There are two flash bulb reflections, which is something you see in most professional frog photos anyway. They can be cloned away, but personally I don't see it subtracting from the quality of the photo. --liquidGhoul (talk) 12:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent capture. Clegs (talk) 19:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is excellent as is DOF, but the flash is just too harsh. It's not just on the eye, but on the skin as well. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 03:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support The flash does not seem like a major issue to me. Juliancolton (Talk) 13:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Juliancolton. Samsara (FA • FP) 17:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very good image quality. Ilikefood (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:New England Tree Frog - Litoria subglandulosa.jpg MER-C 09:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]