Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Leaving Vienna

Painting by Józef Brandt. 'Leaving Vienna' or 'Return from Vienna'. Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth army returning with loot after defeating the Ottoman Empire forces sieging Vienna, during the battle of Vienna (1683). One of the best Brandt's - double exotic - PLC and the Ottomans on one picture.

Nominate and support. - Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 06:16, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the source ([1], linked at [2]) should be given on the image description page. It would be nice if that page also gave more information on the painting itself (72×110cm, oil on canvas, painted when?; in a private collection). Despite the interesting subject (at least, interesting to those who can grasp and appreciate the subtle point of both Ottomans and Polish warriors being shown), I fail to see what makes this image so outstanding that it should be a featured picture. On a side note, Józef Brandt’s Gallery contains several times the Polish text "Olej na płótnie" (oil on canvas). That should be fixed. Furthermore, I wonder whether having such a gallery here on Wikipedia is appropriate at all. Why not just link to this gallery? It's more comprehensive anyway... Lupo 21:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, unless something is done about ~~two~~ four major flaws: The burned-out sky (uneven lighting?), and the very murky colors, the small size, and the compression artifacts. --Janke | Talk 13:45, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Picture of a picture. Mark ¹ 03:05, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No composition discernable in the picture. --Ghirlandajo 14:54, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. An interesting and exotic piece of art.--Molobo 15:03, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support but source should be given. --Lysy ^(talk) 19:04, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
( + ) Support Either Version. Added a slightly lighter image, but nothing too much could be achieved without burning out the highlights.

Not promoted Raven4x4x 02:21, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]