Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Julia set
Appearance
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/ba/Julia_set_%28highres_02%29.jpg/220px-Julia_set_%28highres_02%29.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Julia_set_%28highres_01%29.jpg/220px-Julia_set_%28highres_01%29.jpg)
Public domain, user created image created by commons:User:Solkoll. I like the top one better, but both are equally pretty. The top one is in Julia set but the bottom one doesn't have an article attached to it. I'm nominating the top one, but I figured as an alternate, add the other one as well. The multi-colored one is a featured picture on Commons.
- Nominate and support. - AllyUnion (talk) 09:45, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
- Support first. I don't like the banding or the garish colors on the second. —Cryptic (talk) 02:32, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose -Don't think we need more than one FP fractal. Seen a few and you've seen em all IMHO. --Deglr6328 02:56, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. We can have a few, but I've seen more stunning ones before. Enochlau 13:16, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Aprose. The current FP fractals are better. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-09-4 17:16
Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:13, 18 September 2005 (UTC)