Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Julia Shaw (2)

Julia Shaw

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2019 at 21:35:36 (UTC)

Reason: The previous nomination ended up in a bit of a mess with alternatives being thrown around to find a better clip. Alternative 2 of that nomination ended up at 4-0 and remains in the article. It is presented here for a more clean, second hearing as I believe it still has FP potential.
Articles in which this image appears: Julia Shaw (psychologist)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: Boris Breuer, cropped by Kmhkmh

Support as nominator – MER-C 21:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Looks like a promotional photo for a professional practice, possibly by a commercial photographer. The image itself in unexceptional. Sca (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article was created by Kmhkmh, a Wikipedian of 14000+ edits, not a single purpose account (the latter suggests covert advertising) and survived an AFD. As far as I'm concerned, this is legit (and if you look at e.g. my block log, deletion log, move log and WP:GS/Crypto, you will see that I am staunchly opposed to the abuse of Wikipedia for promotional purposes). MER-C 22:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Reading the afd discussion, she doesn't seeem very notable and so I'd avoid promoting an image like this. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, it's just way too tightly cropped at the top. Perhaps we'd be best planning this on WT:FPC beforehand, because there's probably a good image available from the source, but this one isn't it. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.3% of all FPs} 01:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'd support File:Julia Shaw 2018-03-10 (cropped).jpg. Don't see the relevance of it being a professional photo or of opinions about notability when it's already been to AfD with a consensus to keep. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nice portrait, but the one shown here is not the one used in the article. --Yann (talk) 09:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this crop is not shown in any article, which is a prerequisite for Featured Picture. Mattximus (talk) 23:02, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]