Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Flamethrower

I think this is a great black in white photo.

Nominate and support. - RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 22:41, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The fire and smoke seem a little bit blurry to me. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 17:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - blurry. Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is a shot a flamethrower in action, for those of you who can't see details in the thumbnail. TomStar81 06:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Oops, I meant to do that when I commented and I forgot ;) TomStar81 06:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Doesn't really work for me. I would've thought the intensity of the flames would be better expressed in colour. Enochlau 22:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. A little too blurry. Ouuplas 23:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, a color pic would be more impressive, also I'd like to see the full range the flames are extending. --Dschwen 07:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
( − ) Oppose Have to agree with Dschwen --Fir0002 08:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the clearest illustration of a flamethrower in action. This image does not show the stream of fire that a flamethrower emits. D e nni ☯ 02:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the best photograph of a flamethrower I've seen. Would be much better in color with full range shown. Oberiko 04:16, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:14, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]