Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Wine grape diagram en.svg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Original - A cross section of the grape and grape stem, of a grape variety used in winemaking
Reason
Well done SVG illustration with high EV to the three articles where it appears.
Articles this image appears in
Grape, Winemaking, and Acids in wine
Creator
LadyofHats
  • I think the red labels are categories and the black labels that follow are items in that category. For example: There is the category Flesh and then, signaled in the diagram, septal flesh, inner flesh and outer flesh. Also the two grapes are pictured differently because they are showing the structural elements and the other the chemical contents appearing in different zones.  franklin.vp  22:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
maybe some indentation of the black labels will help with the red-black labels issue.  franklin.vp  22:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
@ZooFari: Franklin.vp is correct about the labeling. As for the transparent grape, can you fix it? If so it would help. You can also make the labeling clearer if you wish, although I thought it was fine. Nezzadar [SPEAK] 00:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I moved your comment; presumably it's directed at me. It's good now. SpencerT♦Nominate! 00:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Durova, I think that was a source because it had an image of an actual cut open grape in it. All of the actual nameing data seems to be in later sources (#3 particularly). I think that seeing an actual grape is a prerequisite to drawing one. Nezzadar [SPEAK] 18:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Surely Blogspot is not the only available source for an image of a sliced grape? Durova362 18:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Surely the other six sources are more than enough to demonstrate that the information is legitimate. Besides, I=if Blogspot is unreliable, what does that say about your blog there? Nezzadar [SPEAK] 20:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would never use Durova's blog as a cited source, not even for an article on image restoration! If it's good enough to use, it should be published. There are rare exceptions, of course. Mostlyharmless (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am saying that if I need an image of a cut open grape, I would use the clearest one I could find, regardless of where it is, it's a g-d damned picture of a grape! I don't see the problem, considering that the other sources are good. Nezzadar [SPEAK] 19:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Wine grape diagram en.svg --Muhammad(talk) 04:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]