Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Threskiornis molucca - Perth.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2012 at 05:33:52 (UTC)

Support as nominator --JJ Harrison (talk) 05:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 06:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question Did you have this guy specially washed? IMO this is too bright, they are typically much dirtier and less seagull-clean. (Obviously that pic is not anywhere near this standard, but just uploaded to show colour comparison with a seagull.) It's also a pity his feet couldn't be seen. I would consider supporting a darker version of this. --99of9 (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Per the article text: "The body plumage is white although it may become brown-stained". This one was pretty close to Seagull white. JJ Harrison (talk) 22:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Don't care if it was washed for this shot, striking picture. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Crisco. Clegs (^{engage in rational discourse}) 13:43, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jkadavoor (talk) 06:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support No one wants to see a dirty bird anyway. Saffron Blaze (talk) 07:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Threskiornis molucca - Perth.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]