Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Columbia at Dawn

Columbia at Dawn

A striking photo that just looks cool; Appears in Space Shuttle Columbia, and was taken from a NASA website.

Nominate and support. - Quadraxis 17:10, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This image is beautiful. cohesion | talk 05:28, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
I see annoying horizontal lines in the larger version of this image. Is it just me? Otherwise, it's great. -- Longhair | Talk 12:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any horizontal lines -Quadraxis 01:57, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ahkayah cuarenta y siete 21:24, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -I've replaced the image with a larger version and added more information to the page though I still can't support it. The building and light in the foreground are highly distracting and there are much better images of the phenomenon out there. The Cassini launch being one.--Deglr6328 02:09, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Although there have been complaints about the building in the picture, I think that it adds more to the feel of being in the audiance watching the rocket launch into space. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 11:59, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful picture. TomStar81 05:23, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
( − ) Oppose Nice pic, but too noisy for my standards --Fir0002 09:22, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Agree with Fir0002. Enochlau 10:49, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the larger version is indeed too noisy. Phoenix2 18:41, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
Support. It's like looking at God. There's noise in the large version, but the image is so big that I don't care. Coffee 13:06, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. agree with too noisy.say1988 02:37, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
Support. --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 02:49, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Circeus 14:38, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
Support Great looking photo. The image is huge, so the noise shouldn't really be a problem. Balster neb 11:51, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Any picture will have noise if you blow it up enough. At regular size, it's striking. --Golbez 22:13, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Echidnae 23:22, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. -Lommer | ^talk 02:23, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Bevo 12:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - we already have one FP on Space Shuttle Columbia and several other similar NASA pictures. This one is very good, but its a crowded field. -- Solipsist 20:43, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The buildings in the foreground give it a unique effect. --Tito xd 00:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted 13/6 -- Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 04:26, August 14, 2005 (UTC)