Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cinderella Castle
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2012 at 03:05:29 (UTC)
- Reason
- Already been a Valued image in Commons. Good image quality.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Cinderella Castle, Magic Kingdom
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Katie Rommel-Esham
- Support as nominator --Mediran talk to me! 03:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support I checked commons:Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States, as a copyright check, and we're fine. Nice photo, not perfect (it's a teensy bit out of focus), but good. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:28, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose nice colors but has too many problems with focus to be a featured picture. --Pine✉ 09:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Partly as per Pine, but mainly as each spire is leaning towards the centre rather than verticle. Most noticible with the tallest spire which looks like one strong gust of wind and it'll fall off... gazhiley 13:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- According to the article, 'An optical trick known as forced perspective makes the Castle appear even larger than it actually is. As it becomes taller, its proportions get smaller. For example, using this method, the top spire of the Castle is actually close to half of the size it "appears." ' Not sure if the mentioned leaning is actually part of the architectural design, and how perspective should be presented in such a case. --125.25.5.90 (talk) 19:03, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Even though there don't seem to be any in the article, I have to imagine that a better photograph of this is possible. That's not to say that this is bad but for something like the Cinderella Castle that is probably photographed a million times a year, the bar should be incredibly high and this just doesn't meet it. Cat-fivetc ---- 12:30, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Not promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)