Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chipmunk
Appearance
- Reason
- Accurately shows the subject, in its environment, in a way that relates to part of the article and is of high quality.
- Articles this image appears in
- Chipmunk
- Creator
- EL C
- Support as nominator MBisanz talk 04:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Probably a good idea to Withdraw at this point. Can someone do the paperwork (edits) for this? MBisanz talk 15:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Risker (talk) 04:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Motion blur, washed out. Just a snapshot - FPs need to be more than this. --Janke | Talk 06:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose A picture of a common subject needs to be much more spectacular. Cacophony (talk) 07:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I like the picture, but can't support due to the chipmunk's tail being cut off. As said above, for a relatively easily taken image, the quality really has to be top-notch. faithless (speak) 07:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose- does have a very snap-shotty feel, and the grass is rather distracting. J Milburn (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - Blur and tail being cut off. 8thstar 15:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Very little of the photo is in focus. crassic![talk] 19:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cacophony --St.daniel Talk 14:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted Withdrawn. Thegreenj 16:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)