Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chicago River

Chicago River

This was an incomplete nomination. So I do not know the rational behind it. It's included in Chicago and Chicago river among other, and was taken by a wikipedian User:Kkmd.

Here is the nomination for the larger version. --Tewy 18:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate and neutral. - Andrew c 15:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose doesn't meet size requirements --Bridgecross 16:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Size and vertical lines not parallel. Alvesgaspar 16:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Oppose - nowhere near big enough, I did leave the nominator (Kkmd) a message, but this does not adhere to the FP criteria and they did not follow the nomination instructions. I vote to have the nomination removed until he can do it properly. I should just clarify: this pic was not nominated by Andrew c - it was originally placed here by its author, Kkmd, and this is how the he left the page until Andrew c cleaned it up. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 17:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Size requirements. --Tewy 19:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
i think you need to chill out, it's just a cool picture of the chicago river. don't take it so personally that it is the wrong size or that i didn't follow the fp criteria or whatever. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.193.164.219 (talk • contribs).
- Well why are you trying to nominate it for FP if it doesn't fit the FP criteria? A beautiful shot, yes, but not a FP. --⁪froth^{T C} 22:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Er... you don't make any sense - to become an FP, it has to meet the FP criteria; so if it doesn't meet the FP criteria, why is it being nominated for FP? —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 12:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the image, but as noted above the size requirements are a little under staffed. If a bigger version could be found I would support. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the picture, as well, but it does not meet the size requirements. Wikipediarul e s 2221 02:31, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 800 by 553! - Adrian Pingstone 13:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Doesn't meet size requirements. sign here • HAPPY HOLIDAYS! — s d 3 1 4 1 5 ^π 03:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral; the details are there, the image quality is there, but the size of the image just isn't right; it's far too small. -- Alt iris Exeunt 03:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose size matters, if it meet the requirments then I would strong support. — Arjun 15:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 12:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]