Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ana Santos Aramburo
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2016 at 06:34:58 (UTC)
- Reason
- A really nice image. Plenty of personality, nice use of colour
- Articles in which this image appears
- Ana Santos Aramburo
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People, I'm not quite sure which subcategory; Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others may be the best fit.
- Creator
- National Library of Spain
- Support either as nominator, prefer Alt 2 – Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – A bit excessive flash glare on her face. Not optimal file/image size, given the camera. Not sure about the crop either [1], the background's depth is appealing. Bammesk (talk) 15:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Bammesk: I don't think the flash is that bad, but you're right about the crop, so I'll put that up as an alt. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'd suggest a compromise between these two. The architectural backdrop on the right of the uncropped version seems excessive. (Halfway between her elbow and the stonework would be better, with probably at bit less background on the left.) Sca (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Alt 2 or similar crops, weak support Alt 1 and original nom. Wish list: no flash glare, larger file size! Bammesk (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- I'd suggest a compromise between these two. The architectural backdrop on the right of the uncropped version seems excessive. (Halfway between her elbow and the stonework would be better, with probably at bit less background on the left.) Sca (talk) 23:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Alt. 2 --Rainbow Archer (talk) 15:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Alt. 2 – Sca (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- I reduced the flash glare and uploaded a revision. If you disagree, just revert. Pinging those who voted: @Adam Cuerden, Rainbow Archer, and Sca: -- Bammesk (talk) 01:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- To me too. Still a bit of glare at full res but otherwise not obtrusive. Sca (talk) 14:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Alt. 2 – Jobas (talk) 10:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Bammesk, Jobas, Rainbow Archer, and Sca: Just noting that Alt 2 had been a CSS crop; I've provided an actual uploaded crop as near as possible to it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Makes no diff to me. Sca (talk) 00:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Alt. 2 per all. Just to know, who exactly is the author in this case. Library, or the user uploaded or some pro?? -The Herald (Benison) • the joy of the LORDmy strength 06:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support Alt. 2 That's a nice middle ground on the crop. Cat-fivetc ---- 20:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Promoted File:Ana Santos Aramburo en la sede de Recoletos de la Biblioteca Nacional de España (crop 2).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 06:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- There is a clear concensus that alt 2 should be promoted. Armbrust The Homunculus 06:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)