Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of FC Barcelona seasons/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was kept by The Rambling Man 22:29, 25 August 2011 [1].
List of FC Barcelona seasons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject
I am nominating this for featured list removal because I am helping to uphold the standards that I have been told about, which this list clearly doesn't come close to. All those pages are FAR outdated:
1- The table is not sortable
2- It doesn't meet the new WP:ACCESS requirements
3- Hardcoded HTML background font color elements should not be used.
4- The bright colours used for 1st/2nd/3rd places could well cause accessibility issues. A pastel-coloured background would be preferable.
Regardless of whether other stuff exists with lower quality, we as wikipedians should uphold the standards to all or none at all. The double-standard is a very dangerous game to play, especially by admin. In short, this list needs a lot of work to keep its feauture status.Strawberry on Vanilla (talk) 13:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There are no "Hardcoded HTML font color elements", where do you see those.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Everywhere. Again, WP:ACCESS. Strawberry on Vanilla (talk) 14:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't change people's comments. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Everywhere. Again, WP:ACCESS. Strawberry on Vanilla (talk) 14:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - From what I can see of the nominator's edit history, this strikes me as a POINTy nomination. Should be struck down. – PeeJay 15:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Stop trying to sway the subject; the list meets almost none of the requirements needed to keep its feauture status. Strawberry on Vanilla (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -Seems to be other reasons to this nomination however this article is in very good condition see no reason to remove. Warburton1368 (talk) 19:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As I said on the Aston Villa nomination, the only column that has any business being sortable is the top goalscorer tally. Also I think it is pretty well established that gold is for first place, silver is for second. I really don't another colour being used just to satisfy some obscure guideline. This is a waste of time.--EchetusXe 21:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.