Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc

Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: Clear consensus for de-listing

Result: No longer a featured list. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 21:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per lack of reliable sources attesting to these depictions. User submitted IMDB reviews should not be basis of inclusion to this list. Corpx 18:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Technical question here: how would you prefer to verify that a film exists? The IMDB sourcing was considered adequate at FLC, so I'd prefer to re-source as an alternative to delisting if WP:RS standards really have altered. I don't think anyone's really challenging that these depictions really happened. A similar dilemma arose a while back with song lyrics. There certainly are many songs that have referenced her, and all entries were verified, but due to copyright concerns we can no longer link to those verifications. Durova^Charge! 00:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The use of IMDB is pretty controversial. A recent attempt at a guideline (Wikipedia:Citing IMDb) failed. WP:RSEX claims the (writing) credits are reliable. From the discussion on those pages, it sounds like IMDb should be a fairly reliable source if all you have to do is assert that such and such a film exists, with that title. Beyond that, I'm much less confident. It is always going to be difficult to source pop-culture. I appreciate the problem with song lyrics. The source doesn't have to be online. If someone has access to the album notes (a form of publication) that contain the lyrics, then they can cite those. If the lyrics haven't been published, and online sources are going by ear, well that's a different story.

Durova, if you want help reformatting the citations into the ref/footnote system, let me know and I'll lend a hand. I see the IMDB links have been removed. I'd have preferred to keep them for now. Poor sources are better than no sources. Colin°^Talk 14:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took a quick glance and here's some problems I found.

2005 Top 10: The Forty-Niners Graphic novel One of the officers, named Joanna Dark, dresses in chainmail and uses holy powers. - WP:OR
d'Arcmon Anime The seventh movie of the Digimon series features a protagonist who is a female angel and soldier. She uses a special sword attack called "La Pucelle." - again, WP:OR
Shaman King Anime The leader of the group X-Laws, Iron Maiden Jeanne, is a French girl who receives a divine revelation while praying in church that she must purge an evil force or the world will be destroyed. - again, WP:OR
Kamikaze Kaito Jeanne Manga and anime The reincarnation of Joan of Arc, the gymnastic champion Maron Kusakabe, is the main character. She uses her God-given powers and arsenal of push-pins to trap demons who hide in works of art. Arina Tanemura, writer (manga edition). - Where is this cited to?
Jeanne Manga Three volume work set in the Hundred Years' War whose central character's life parallels that of Joan of Arc. - again WP:OR
Blade Storm: Hundred Years War PS3 game, Xbox 360 game, planned to be a major character. - WP:CRYSTAL
Jeanne d'Arc PSP game, Title character in a fantasy universe loosely based on the historical story. - WP:OR
Age of Empires: The Age of Kings Nintendo DS game major playable character. - citation?
La Pucelle: Tactics PlayStation game. The title is an allusion to Joan of Arc. - WP:OR
Perfect Dark Nintendo 64 game. The central character is named Joanna Dark, a play on Jeanne d'Arc. - I think it'd be WP:OR construing it as a cultural depiction without a reference.
World Heroes series NeoGeo fighting game. The character Janne D'Arc, a beautiful French swordwoman with pyrokinetic powers, is very much inspired by Joan of Arc. - Inspired by Joan = WP:OR unless cited.
Wonderfalls Fox Television series theme inspired by Joan of Arc. - show article doesnt even mention Joan - WP:OR
Clone High Joan of Arc's clone appeared in the traditionally animated show. - proof?
Wishbone Animated series. Episode 11 is entitled Bone of Arc. The central premise of the series is a boy and his dog who daydream about traveling into history and literature to become heroes. - Where is the connection?
Maude CBS sitcom. The theme song includes the line 'Joan of Arc with the Lord to guide her/she was a sister who really cooked.' - Proof?

That was from starting at the end and stopping at the TV section. I dont think anything should have "featured" status when its lacking so many sources. To be honest, I dont think this should even be considered for "good list" (if that exists) in its current status. Corpx 04:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the column that contained IMDB sources for a few of these entries. I'm not saying those are adequate sources, but at least they are sources. That might shift some issues from WP:OR to WP:V. Colin°^Talk 05:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

De-list for reasons stated. I wodner if it's even possible to put together a comprehensive cultural depictions page that is truly lacking in OR. It seems almost that Wikipedia is the only place such lists are compiled. Though I'm not a pop culture guy, so that assumption may be off. Geraldk 16:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It has been past 2 weeks and no significant changes have been made to it. Corpx 07:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest removing OR. Simply de-featuring is missing the point. Whether featured or not, the OR has to go, though on closer examination, not all the points you raise are OR, and some could be sourced. Carcharoth 09:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Half the list is completely unsourced and I'd say 30% of the rest are sourced to IMDB, which per above comments is not a reliable source. The list will be pretty empty if I remove these. Corpx 18:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Half the list is completely unsourced? I'd say the ones that link to Wikipedia articles would be pretty easy to source - just go to the relevant Wikipedia article and yank a source from there. The ones sourced to IMDB can be upgraded to better sources or removed. By the way, I've only ever worked on articles at FAR. Do the featured lists similarly go through a review process before they are put up for removal? Or do lists go straight to the removal stage? I will take a closer look, regardless of the outcome here. But would urge that de-listing does not occur until the review and attempts at improving the list have taken place. Otherwise it wastes time going back to FL to see if it can be returned to featured status. I realise it has been, as you say, two weeks, but can you wait a few more days? Carcharoth 22:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
De-list The list doesn't follow WP:ECITE properly. All of those external jumps have to have a separate entry in the References section. --Crzy cheetah 18:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This is easily fixed. How much time do I (and others) have to fix this? Carcharoth 23:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - If it's posible to fix this list in 5-7 days, then go ahead. As long as we see some progress during this nomination, it can stay. Usually, nominations get closed because of inactivity. I personally would be glad to keep this list featured. --Crzy cheetah 07:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
De-list, unfortunately. Too much fails to satisfy WP:OR and WP:V. Colin°^Talk 19:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd say 80% of the sourcing problems could easily be fixed. It is plain that the films exist, even if you worry about them being sourced to IMDB. I've been reading through this in detail, and only a few items strike me as WP:OR, some of which might be confirmed from other sources with a little bit of effort. Give me a timescale to work with, and then return at the end of that time period and see what you think then. Carcharoth 23:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
De-list, unfortunately. I just don't have time to address the sourcing problems now. Standards have changed since this list got featured. Durova^Charge! 23:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]