Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:05, 25 April 2012 [1].
Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Albacore (talk) 02:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Meets FL criteria, based on Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Play, another FL. Albacore (talk) 02:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Ruby2010
- No DAB links, and images look good
- "In 1976, when the award's name changed to its current name..." Perhaps change one of the words for flow
- Changed
- "Supporting actress in two of three plays in Neil Simon's Eugene trilogy (Brighton Beach Memoirs and Broadway Bound) were nominated for the Tony..." Should that be "actresses"?
- Yes, fixed.
- No refs for the omitted ceremonies (1948, 50)?
- Do I need them?
- Maybe not, but I am curious why they weren't held. Perhaps a footnote? Ruby 2010/2013 02:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Added a note. Albacore (talk) 19:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The footnote looks good, but perhaps you could add more information than merely noting a ceremony wasn't held? Why did two years not have a ceremony? Has this been difficult to find reliable sources for? Ruby 2010/2013 22:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I can't find any sources saying why the award wasn't held. Is the note necessary then? Albacore (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably not, but I just wanted to check. Ruby 2010/2013 17:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I can't find any sources saying why the award wasn't held. Is the note necessary then? Albacore (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The footnote looks good, but perhaps you could add more information than merely noting a ceremony wasn't held? Why did two years not have a ceremony? Has this been difficult to find reliable sources for? Ruby 2010/2013 22:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Align the ref column so that each ref is in the middle (like you did with the year column)
- Fixed, I think. On my browser/monitor I can't tell the difference. Albacore (talk) 01:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ruby 2010/2013 19:21, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support the promotion of this article. Ruby 2010/2013 17:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Quick comment – Note V appears to be missing a quotation mark toward the end of the sentence.Giants2008 (Talk) 01:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. Albacore (talk) 02:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review: All used images appear to be free and are properly tagged. Goodraise 11:46, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support NapHit (talk) 12:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "six parts of August Wilson's The Pittsburgh Cycle series" -> I'm not convinced "series" isn't redundant here, coming right after "cycle", which already conveys that it's a series. I also think that you could pipe link out the "The" in "The Pittsburgh Cycle", it's not necessary given the possessive—the target article already makes use of "Wilson's Pittsburgh Cycle".
- "in the 2011 remake of The Normal Heart." -> Could be wrong, but wouldn't revival be the correct term, rather than remake, when it's stage plays we're talking about?
- " In 1976, when the award's name changed to its current title, Shirley Knight, portraying Carla in Robert Patrick's Kennedy's Children, won the award." -> I think this one reads a bit awkwardly. Perhaps " The award was renamed in 1976, with Shirley Knight becoming the first winner under the new title for her role as Carla in Robert Patrick's Kennedy's Children" might work a little better.
- Other than that, though, I'm happy enough to support this one. GRAPPLE X 20:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- All addressed. I agree that "series" was redundant. Albacore (talk) 15:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.