Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Morgan Freeman on screen and stage/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCat 11:57, 19 January 2015 [1].
Morgan Freeman on screen and stage[edit]
Morgan Freeman on screen and stage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because he is one of the great actors of our generation and deserves to have a well written career history article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from The Rambling Man[edit]
Quick comments you've waited nearly a month for some interest....
- " in The Pawnbroker (1964), and A Man Called Adam (1966)." no need for the comma.
- Any reason why the image captions avoid mentioning the subject matter?
- I was told on another peer review/fl candidates comment that his last name isn't necessary since the article is about his career so it'd be redundant. I can add it back if you'd like. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- "he was on the television series" he was "on"? Reads weird to me, why not, "he acted/featured in"?
- What sort of show was The Electric Company? It may help us to understand the "various characters" you go on to discuss.
- " earned him second Academy Award nomination for Best Actor, the first for " seems odd to do this in reverse order.
- "he was cast in the films" he appeared in more than those you listed, so perhaps it should be "in films, including..."
- No need to link God.
- "he was in the science fiction action films" grim writing, need to fix it up a little.
- "The Pawnbroaker"? typo.
- Gone, Baby, Gone has no commas.
- Sortable tables mean linked items should be linked every time.
- This is a predominantly USEng article, why are dates in the references in BritEng?
- Done - changed dates to mm, dd, yyyy format. LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: were all the suggestions you gave completed? Or do you have more? LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Cowlibob[edit]
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 18:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
References check of film section
Done LADY LOTUS • TALK
Done LADY LOTUS • TALK I'm going to wait till you sort these out to continue on to the other sections. Cowlibob (talk) 17:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
- @Lady Lotus: Right, sourcing seems to be pretty much sorted except for the Earth Day Special which you can exclude if you want if you can't find an RS. I've done some reworking of the lead as I find that you share my tendency in making the prose of the lead very listy which doesn't really work in making "an engaging lead". So I've tried to reword it to be more like a story of his career rather than bullet points. It probably still needs a bit more work but hopefully looks better now. Cowlibob (talk) 18:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks so much. I removed the Earth Day special, maybe a RS will come along one day :) Is there anything else you find that needs to be fixed before you support it? LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lady Lotus: It's close I'll have a look at what I can do with the lead. Just needs some tweaking, I'll try to have a good look at it tomorrow. Cowlibob (talk) 19:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lady Lotus: Ok I think that does it. Happy to support now, good work! Cowlibob (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lady Lotus: It's close I'll have a look at what I can do with the lead. Just needs some tweaking, I'll try to have a good look at it tomorrow. Cowlibob (talk) 19:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks so much. I removed the Earth Day special, maybe a RS will come along one day :) Is there anything else you find that needs to be fixed before you support it? LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you SO much!!! LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dr. Blofeld[edit]
Support Looks in good shape. I'm sure you'll complete Cow's points. One thing though you might change the web source authors with surname first like the books for consistency.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dr. Blofeld: Thank you :) I made the book cites [firstname lastname] for consistency just because there were fewer of them as opposed to changing all the web cites. Hope that's ok. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from SNUGGUMS[edit]
Resolved comments from Snuggums (talk / edits) |
---|
Looks quite nice :). I don't have many concerns, though Freeman starring in the Broadway adaptation of Driving Miss Daisy should be added. It's also worth mentioning he won a Golden Globe for Best Actor in Driving Miss Daisy and a nomination for Best Supporting Actor in Street Smart since Academy Award nominations and the Academy Award he won are listed. Also, "earned him his third Academy Award nomination, this one for Best Actor" → "earned him his third Academy Award nomination for Best Actor". For the future, yes- references DO need to support names of roles. Can't see any other issues. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:43, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- You're quite welcome, I now support :D (sorry for the delay) Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- No worries, thanks so much :) LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 12:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: @Cowlibob: @Dr. Blofeld: @SNUGGUMS: Thank you all so much for all your help! It means a lot! LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:15, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.