Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Minnesota Golden Gophers men's hockey seasons/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 12 days, 1 support, 2 oppose. Not enough supports along with 2 oppositions. Fail. Crzycheetah 00:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Self-nomination. This is a list of seasons completed by University of Minnesota Golden Gophers men's hockey team. It includes a detailed history of the team's national tournament play. --Gopherbone 04:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose The seasons have to be linked. They have to exist in order to compile a list of them.--Crzycheetah 23:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose as per Crzycheetah; if you see all other season FLs, they link together a series of articles on both the team's season and (I believe) the league's season. You would have to at least create articles for each Golden Gopher season, if not each individual NCAA hockey season for whatever conference/division the team was in. They don't all have to be great articles, but they can't be redlinks either. Anthony Hit me up... 19:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Complete, well referenced, well layed out. Personally, I disagree with the opinion that this article is not FL worthy because other articles do not exist. An article for each NCAA season, and for each Minnesota season, would be nice, however I do not believe the lack of such articles does not detract from the quality of this article. Resolute 14:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SupportThe list is well layed out and referenced.. Season do not have to be linked if you read the criteria; -"contains a finite, complete and well-defined set of items that naturally fit together to form a significant topic of study, and where the members of the set are not sufficiently notable to have individual articles". --Krm500 10:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]- The problem is that the members of this set are sufficiently notable to have individual articles.--Crzycheetah 21:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? We're talking about junior hockey here, not professional hockey. --Krm500 10:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, there are about four links in the lead, why can't others along with these four be linked in the table?--Crzycheetah 17:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Did not notice that, of course the existing articles should be linked. --Krm500 18:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, there are about four links in the lead, why can't others along with these four be linked in the table?--Crzycheetah 17:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? We're talking about junior hockey here, not professional hockey. --Krm500 10:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem is that the members of this set are sufficiently notable to have individual articles.--Crzycheetah 21:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]