Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Waqar Younis/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:05, 4 April 2012 [1].
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Waqar Younis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Zia Khan (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe the list meets the FL criteria. It is based upon existing FL List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Wasim Akram... Zia Khan (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Lemonade51 (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 12:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 10:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Image review: All used images appear to be free and are properly tagged as such. Goodraise 13:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This a free image and tagged as well. Zia Khan (talk) 19:16, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 23:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Resolved comments from Harrias |
---|
;Comments from Harrias talk
|
- Support Harrias talk 19:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support NapHit (talk) 20:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments would he have had an opportunity to play in T20I? I doubt it but worth the question since a fifer is entirely possible in that format and we don't have it covered/mentioned at all here. "He took 3 consecutive" should be 3->three. Sorting by wickets which are the same (e.g. all five wicket matches, all six wicket matches etc) I'd expect to see in then sort by the fewest/most runs conceded. Don't think Ian Botham was Sir Ian Botham when he was part of a fifer in 1992. Finally, consistency with linking (or not) ESPNCricinfo in the refs is needed. I see it linked in 3 and 9 and 12 but not elsewhere. Also, the SHOUTING in ref 5 needs to be addressed, and the consistency of the Cricinfo publisher needs work in ref 41, along with the extra "test" in ref 23. Otherwise, I'd support. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:53, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support The Rambling Man (talk) 08:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.