Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev/archive2
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 03:26, 6 July 2012 [1].
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): —Vensatry (Ping me) 07:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe the list meets the criteria. After the previous nomination the article underwent a thorough copy-edit, reviewed by a few editors and suggestions have been implemented. It is based upon the existing FL, List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Waqar Younis. —Vensatry (Ping me) 07:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support the list meets the criteria. I've reverted back to the last version before the addition of colours, it was too much hassle trying to fix the issues that arose because of it. As there is little benefit to be gained from having them, you might as well not bother. Sorry for wasting your time with this, anyway great work on the list. NapHit (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added colours since that looks to be a very good idea. —Vensatry (Ping me) 12:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
Noticed "third-highest" in the lead and "second highest" in the lead photo caption. Whether a hyphen is in the middle or not should be made consistent.In reference 6, Wisden Almanack should be italicized as a printed publication.Ref 11 has what appears to be a missing second number in its page range.Giants2008 (Talk) 22:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed all. —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (Talk) 20:03, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ZiaKhan 12:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Support – Meets the criteria. ZiaKhan 12:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.