Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Star Wars: The Force Awakens/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Star Wars: The Force Awakens[edit]
List of accolades received by Star Wars: The Force Awakens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Star Wars: The Force Awakens/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Star Wars: The Force Awakens/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Nauriya (Rendezvous), 18:53, October 5, 2016 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list because, it has the potential of becoming a featured list, i previously nominated this article for FLC, but i was already in the 88th Academy Awards nomination process, so i had to remove this nomination. I firmly believe that this article after minor changes and suggestions will become the featured list. Nauriya (Rendezvous), 18:53, October 5, 2016 (UTC)
Resolved comments from Cowlibob (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
This is very far from FL.
Those are my initial comments. Cowlibob (talk) 22:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Cowlibob (talk) 16:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Comments from Birdienest81
- Ref 34: Empire Awards --> Empire since it is the entity behind the awards and the website you are citing fro.
- @Birdienest81: It has always been like that, other articles as well are all linked to only Empire Awards page not Empire Magazine.
- Refs 3 and 34: Cinema Blend and cinemascandinavia are not really strong, credible sources.
- @Birdienest81: Done. Removed 3 and reinstate new and credible source for Bodil Awards. Nauriya (Rendezvous), 2:23, November 13, 2016 (UTC)
That's all for now.
- 2 of the 4 paragraphs have nothing to do with accolades, and the 3rd is a bit tangential. I recommend rewriting the intro to actually be about accolades. Nergaal (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nergaal: You mean 2 and 3? because 4th is all bout accolades. I have raised the concern about para's 1, 2 and 3 in comments below. Nauriya (Rendezvous), December 23, 2016 (UTC)
Comments
- Tend to agree with Nergaal above, the lead is a bit bloated and could use trimming to focus on the awards rather than records or film plots... It's not until the second sentence of para 3 that we start talking about accolades.
- To address this issue I would you to assist rather pointing out, because previously an objection was raised, that first para should contains story arc, director, producers and cast info. Regarding Second para it has to be that way because of film status and it being 3rd highest grossing ever, a seven line details are enough or can be shortened to five but major details must be accounted. Third para is equally important, because a major award ceremony delayed its nominations in order to compensate film as it was already out of league from many other award ceremonies. Fourth and fifth are all about awards. Please let me know how to move further because it has been too long since this article is a FLC nominee. Nauriya (Rendezvous), December 23, 2016 (UTC)
- " The seventh installment in the main Star Wars film series, and first of three in Star Wars sequel trilogy. It stars" I guess that should be a comma rather than a full stop...
- Y Resolved. Nauriya (Rendezvous), December 23, 2016 (UTC)
- I've gone through it twice and count only 30 wins and 98 noms.
- Y After 15 minutes look there are 99 nominations and 33 wins. Nauriya (Rendezvous), December 23, 2016 (UTC)
- "$2 billion" etc should use non-breaking spaces.
- Y resolved using ‑ . Nauriya (Rendezvous), December 23, 2016 (UTC)
- There's one "pending" award (AMA) in the infobox but not the table...
- Y Updated. Nauriya (Rendezvous), December 23, 2016 (UTC)
- Two runners-up in the infobox but five in the table.
- Y There are five runners up from two awards ceremonies, but due to limited space in info-box, runner-ups can only be mention once with parenthesis enclosing numbers of runner-ups. Nauriya (Rendezvous), December 23, 2016 (UTC)
The Rambling Man (talk) 08:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nauriya: There are several comments here that have not been addressed for weeks; are you planning on continuing this nomination or should we go ahead and close this? --PresN 15:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@PresN: I am going to address those issues today or by tomorrow. I was out busy, but I am going to resolve this. Thanks for notifying. Nauriya (Rendezvous), 12:15, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this nomination has been open over 3 months without any supports, and has stalled. Archiving to keep the queue moving. --PresN 21:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.